14.2 Text contribution in Geert Goiris’ Lying Awake; opening + book presentation in Museum M, Leuven

25.1 Contribution to Jack Segbars’ exhibition in 1646, The Hague; opening at 7 p.m.

12.12 A Desert Warehouse: LP with acoustic noise recorded in Donald Judd’s Chinati Foundation

10.12 Extended interview with Mark Manders in Metropolis M

14.10 Interview with Mark Manders, book presentation in Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam

13.10 BRAK 4.1: Duo exhibition with Remco Torenbosch in Duende, Rotterdam



About my work

Writing and image-making are never far apart in my work. From the start it has been placed within several contexts: photography, visual art, literature, criticism, theory. For a while I thought I had to resolve this ambiguity, until I realised that it was a condition to arrive at my work.

Also read the interview.
I investigate ways of writing that border on the visual arts. From 2003, this has resulted in several autonomous works of fiction and visual art, as well as numerous long term collaborations and contributions to art books and projects.

Writing to me is a process of increasing awareness. I write about perception in all its facets, notably solitude, silence, landscape, alienation and trauma. Photography, my discipline of origin, has served as an entry point, and still is an essential—yet largely invisible—tool within my process.

Since 2008 I have been developing a research paper curriculum at the photography department of the Gerrit Rietveld Academy.

Résumé (pdf) | Contact | LinkedIn

Letters and requests:
nickelvd [at] xs4all.nl

Anonymous mailings:
uitnodigingen [at] endlesslowlands.nl
It happened when the silence was complete – usually at night as he lay in bed, relaxed and motionless, his eyes closed or gazing out into the darkness around him. His ears were alert, and he felt his body lying on the mattress, his arms folded under his torso. Then, in unguarded moments that came perhaps once a year, he was overcome by an inward tumult, which could not be traced to any one sense and took possession of his whole body. He heard the silence and at the same time an incessant hiss. He saw the darkness of his eye sockets and at the same time a static crackle. He felt his body's stillness and at the same time an irresistible urge to move, if only a finger, to bring himself out of this state.

He knew there was no point in moving. The heaviness never went away for more than a second before returning. As a child he’d been frightened by these episodes, intimidated by the thought that his own body could make him feel this way. He'd wondered why they happened to him, if he was the only one, and above all, how he could escape them as quickly as possible. Then he would see an enormous field in front of him, too large to fully take in, and an indefinable form racing through it with unstoppable force, blurred with speed. The shape would make the field dark, a fathomless black that flickered electrically, like velour brushed flat with one sweep of the hand. His limbs would sink like lead, as if he could not move them, as if from one moment to the next gravity had doubled. All this time, he would remain exceptionally self-aware, almost as though outside his own body, and to his surprise he would notice that he was lying completely still, with a slow pulse, breathing calmly.

Now that he was older he felt the same surprise. The abstract vision of the field and the form racing through it had made way for a different ones. He experienced a kind of infinitude, like a cosmos, a field of prickles and tingles arising from his own powers of observation, which had been completely disabled just a moment earlier. How could a state of inactivity give rise to this inextricable tangle of signals? It was the most treacherous calm imaginable. Sometimes he was haunted by the feeling that his body was forcing this on him, playing a sadistic game.

Publication planned in February. Description will follow.
We said goodbye to the house on a windy afternoon in late September. While my mother and G waited by the overloaded cars, I went in through the side door one last time. I had recently bought a microphone and a device to capture sound. As I moved from room to room—scullery, hallway, kitchen, corridor, cupboardbed room—I recorded everything.

An abandoned house bears a specific kind of silence, a silence steeped in absence. Sound has that unique quality: it can make you aware that a place remains in existence while no one is there and time progresses. My mother could never get used to that. She must have experienced it for years, every time she arrived, parked the car on the terrace and switched off the engine—a hush. She would then get out, make her round through the house, turn on the main switch, open the water valve, light the gas heaters and start loading the refrigerator. This routine unrolled itself pretty much weekly, and had been built up during the many years she had come here together with Wim, her husband. My second father. Since she was alone, however, silence returned as soon as she completed her round and regained possession of the house, exuding a sense of absence even when she was at home.

While moving through the house, it dawned on me that silence is not actually silence. Silence is sound; here it consisted of overhead planes, birds beating their wings, idling blowflies. Tractors, turbines, rustling leaves. Bated breath and suppressed swallowing. I had become so accustomed to these particular noises that I did not hear them anymore. Recording them enabled me to listen as though I was a new arrival—yet at the same time I knew I would never hear them again. Not even if I would return.

“When you think of the farm, what sound pops into your head?”

My mother closed her eyes. “The refrigerator pump. When it switches on, that buzz.”

Later, when the recordings had already been made and we were on our way back to Amsterdam, she said: “A swan taking off.”

I truly hoped that, by some coincidence, I had captured a swan’s wingbeats on the path between the grasslands at dawn.

In ‘Embedded Texts’, three pages from ‘No mirror can guard you’ are merged with fragments from a desert journal. Both storylines provide a context for each other, but the text as a whole never reaches closure. It rather functions as a loop of thought, dwelling on the entanglement of past and present.

The texts circle around the abandonment of a long cherished family farm. Before leaving it empty, the protagonist records the particular sounds of every room, sounds he had previously mistaken for silence. In the desert, he again aims to record silence, but is confronted by his own restlessness. The seemingly quotidian observations from ‘No mirror’ then form a haunting motive.

Written for the (cancelled) catalogue of the 2011 Montreal Biennial, ‘Embedded Texts’ was first published in April 2012 by the South African platform Sometimes, on the occasion of a group exhibition of text-based works.
It was inescapable. The oversized advertisement with the author’s portrait of an American woman followed me all across the city.

“What do you think, are you going to read her book?” my father asked as he drove me to the railway station.

“Absolutely not.”

“Why not?”

“I can’t stand her.”

“Did you even read her last book?”

“I can think of something more important.”

He sighed. “God, you’re blasé. Everybody seems to be searching for the all-important lately.”

“What’s wrong with that?”

“It’s very liberating to read a nice fat page-turner from time to time. You have to be open to it. Otherwise you’re only overlooking it, the real thing, the unpretentious. You’re so afraid other people might think you appreciate that type of thing.” He snorted. “If you wouldn’t worry about it so much, they will figure that out soon enough.”

“It’s not about that. It’s the whole air that surrounds it. It’s impossible to overlook. To try and persuade people to buy a book with a picture like that—what a fuss. I’m just not interested. And I’m not going to defend myself for it.”

“But you are.”

“That’s because you’re provoking me.”

“You’ve had that answer ready,” my father said, breaking off the conversation. I couldn’t think of anything else to say, even though I pondered it the entire train ride home.

(Sunday, 13 October 2002)



* * *



Much against my habit, I sneaked back into bed when she left the house, off to her work. She went out saying that she did not understand at all why she was living with me, and with that, she shut the door.

Now that I’ve committed them to the paper, these sentences I was curious about, they fail to impress me. Winogrand said: “I photograph to find out what something will look like photographed.”

A shift of perspective. That must be why certain things stay with me. But there are some things one cannot write about.

(Friday, 21 January 2005)

From a letter to publisher and designer Roger Willems:

“Where does it become art, you ask. Regarding the text itself, it all comes down to a basic attitude. Together, the stories delineate the breeding ground of my writing. By sifting through the manuscript and repeatedly rephrasing things, I am trying to get over the fact that I wrote it as an adolescent.

“I guess in finding something essential, one necessarily ends at a very small, circumscribed point. Sparse and unadorned and without trying to make it broader, more artistic or more conceptual than it is. Until nothing remains but revealing the psychological urges behind the writing.

“The one where I argue with my father about not buying a book (Inescapable, 13 Oct. 2002) is quite telling. It’s about the weight of the other’s gaze, but also about my own gaze which, even unbothered by the existence of others, is inclined to view all sorts of things as self-betrayal. I think this book comes down to an attempt of making something which doesn’t feel like a betrayal.”
no mirrorNo mirror can guard you
Nickel van Duijvenboden
Roma Publications, 2011
ISBN 978-90-77459-55-3

Dutch and English
17 x 24 cm / 96 p. / paperback
€13,50

Order here
Imagine a group of uniformed men: soldiers, high-ranking officers, physicists, and journalists. They’re huddled together in a dusty trench dug just for the occasion—the excavator is still there, casting a shadow over them. Before their eyes, the desert stretches on for miles, the view uninterrupted except for a distant mountain range. There is nothing to see. Silence. A warm breeze drifts over their heads, making them all equal.

A siren wails across the level sands from various directions. There is no way of telling where the source of the sound could be.

– One minute, someone says.

People start pushing and shoving.

– Stay down.

– But I’m sticking out.

– You’ll be fine. It won’t come to that.

– How could you possibly know?

The last one pushes at the others again. They settle into a mass.

– Do you have children? he asks me.

I nod.

– What are we doing here, in God’s name?

– Shut your trap, another man says.

The silence lasts for seconds. Instinctively, the men bow their heads. I can feel the boy behind me laying his on my back. I can’t be sure I’m not imagining it, but even with my forehead pressed against the sandy wall of the trench and my eyes squeezed shut, I see a flash of light. Suddenly a shock wave travels through the ground, rippling the desert floor like a sheet. Then a low roar comes crashing over us, pressing us down, as if bulldozers were rolling over the trench.

Without raising my head over the edge, I open my eyes. Sand and dust fall onto my neck. I can’t see a thing, not even the wall of the trench, my fingers digging into the dry soil. The sand gets into everything—my nostrils, my ears, the collar and sleeves of my jacket. When all I can hear is the whisper of shifting dust, I finally dare to raise my head a little. I can feel a warm wind, warmer than the desert air.

– It’s coming this way, the man next to me shouts. There’ll be nothing left of us.

Aleksander is a middle-aged man when he decides to re-read his father’s letters from the 1950s. He has always been sceptical about them. Not only because they contain unimaginable stories, but also because his father left him behind when he embarked on his adventurous journeys, and chose to publish the letters in a novel before Aleksander could even read.

‘Aleksander’ is the provisional title for a short fiction, currently being written as part of a long-term collaboration with the Belgian artist Geert Goiris. A substantial book is planned to appear in 2011 and will comprise photographs by Geert and a text by me.

Geert Goiris travelled to Antarctica twice for his project Whiteout: The Unreliable Narrator. Along with his other work, the images from this journey form an estranging oeuvre in which bizarre natural phenomena and objects play an important role.

After reading Plateau (2008), Geert decided to give me carte blanche for a story in his book. ‘Aleksander’ can be seen as a prologue to the final text. It was released on the occasion of a reading in the Hamburger Kunsthalle and a publication of CAB Burgos.

Download the full text in Documents
czar bombaGeert Goiris: Czar Bomba
Geert Goiris, Nickel van Duijvenboden
Caja de Burgos, 2010
ISBN 978-84-92637-35-5

Spanish and English
28,5 x 23,8 cm / 72 p. / hardcover
€12,-

Order here
We were in a cab with Parisa heading north, towards Navid’s place to record a second take. Through the open windows of the car I saw the Tehrani high-rises passing by on both sides of the Kordestan Expressway. The engine produced a high-pitched noise. It barely managed going uphill. The air flowing in smelled metallic; it stuck to the back of my throat like a cake of lead. The mountains to the north were veiled by an ashen sky. We took an exit near the park and queued up behind the perpetual traffic jam on Valiasr Avenue. The cab driver bent over to his radio and tuned to a programme with modern Iranian pop music.

“It won’t be long,” Parisa said apologetically. Turning in her seat, she accidentally unclipped her seatbelt. She pushed it aside airily. “They never work anyway.”

“Is this an expensive neighbourhood?” I asked.

She nodded. “Cleaner air.”

“Where does your circle of friends live?”

“Scattered around Tehran. Most of them live with their parents, in the suburbs.”

“The good parts.”

She shrugged. “What’s the difference if you cannot leave?”

We took a turn into a narrow side street and stopped in front of a fence. I could look under the apartment building. The entrance looked well maintained. There were parked cars maybe two generations younger than the dented working horse that had carried us all the way up from the city centre. We were let in by a buzzer and took the elevator to the top floor. Navid’s room, an attic perched on a flat roof, was directly above his parent’s home. The access door to the roof was open. There was a faint smell of marijuana. Navid welcomed us rather phlegmatically, but the willingness with which he set up his audio equipment conveyed a concealed joy.

The short story Panopticon, A Fictionalised Travelogue was conceived as a contribution to the group project Sideways, which evolved around the topic of being displaced as an artist. Part of the group process was creating an exhibition in Tehran.

The impression this process made on me is expressed in Panopticon, a partly fictional travel journal. The duality of a feeling of belonging versus a sensation of displacement is present all the time in situations where my vantage points, language and photography, come into play.

Another motif is the paradoxical sensation of meeting and collaborating with Iranians of the same age as myself: the more I understood of the political deadlock they dealt with in making art, the more liberating it was for me to be there and work with them.

Panopticon was printed in the sizeable book Sideways: Reflections on Changing Contexts in Art. Its publication coincided with a group exhibition in the Museum voor Moderne Kunst in Arnhem, the Netherlands. The small catalogue Sideways in Tehran is a remainder of the activities in Iran.
sideways in tehranSideways: Reflections on Changing Contexts in Art
Atousa Bandeh Ghiasabadi, Sara Blokland, Nickel van Duijvenboden, Bassam Chekhes, Katrin Korfmann, Tina Rahimy
Fonds BKVB, 2010
ISBN 978-90-76936-24-6

English
22 x 28,5 cm / 148 p. + 32 p. / paperback with additional stitched-in reader
€29,95

Order here

sideways in tehranSideways in Tehran
Atousa Bandeh Ghiasabadi, Amirali Ghasemi (ed.)
Self-issued, 2008

Persian and English
14,5 x 21 cm / 24 p. / stapled

Comes free with the main Sideways publication
“We’ve left the bicycles behind on the road and are now continuing on foot,” I heard Stefan say behind me. As always, the realization that he was filming suddenly changed everything.

“Nickel, why are we walking through these woods?”

“To see where this path leads.”

“What are you hoping to find?”

“Hoping to find? I have no idea. The remains of a penal colony, I guess.”

“Aren’t you scared?”

“Scared? Of what?”

“Bodies.”

I knew what had given him that idea. A couple of days before, I had read him a passage about a mass grave. It described corpses sliding down a mountainside after an overfilled grave had burst open. The permafrost had kept the bodies perfectly intact.

“Or did they get rid of all that?” he asked.

“I don’t think so.”

He stopped and pointed his camera at the cart track, which at this point was almost entirely overgrown. He was unaware of his shoe sinking into the muddy ground.

“Are you hoping somewhere inside that we find a mass grave at the end of this path?”

“Somewhere inside? What’s that supposed to mean? Deep down in my heart? Jesus.”

I started walking again.

“You don’t really want to go that far, do you?” he shouted.

I shook my head. “We passed that point a long time ago. Whatever we find now, we’ll just have to accept it. We can’t hit rewind any more. If you’re so keen on making a documentary, why don’t you just interview yourself?”

He was silent.

“You know why we’re here. Everything we’ve done has been leading up to this. We want to get an impression of what it was like by standing in the place where it happened. We’re not tourists. We’re trying to rouse something that lies slumbering beneath this landscape. Otherwise you could just as well make some garden-variety travel film, and it would never occur to us that the road we just cycled on might contain the crushed bones of forced labourers.”

Behind me I heard the camera snap shut. “You’re just afraid of feeling empty. You always have been.”

In the short story ‘Latecomers’ two brothers make a bicycle trek through a not explicitly named “guilty landscape” – a term coined by Dutch painter Armando to designate sites that once harboured atrocities. While searching for remnants, the two brothers are confronted with the obscure beauty and desolation of the landscape. The question what has driven them to go there becomes the subject of a fraternal conversation.

This story originated from two biking trips I made with my brother along the former Iron Curtain in central Germany. An important motive was to study the way our experience of nature is distorted by historical knowledge. Another theme is the problematic relation of the generation of the 70s and 80s with such unimaginable events as the Holocaust and the stalinistic labour camps. How can these issues maintain their urgency to younger generations? Does our involvement with history consist of more than a lust for the spectacular?

‘Latecomers’ was written for Lunar Distance, a curatorial programme by Suzanne Wallinga involving an exhibition and a book for De Hallen Haarlem. The project studied the role of images in relation to epistemological questions like “What can we know?” Next to this text, the book includes essays by Arie Altena and Mariska Kriek.
lunar distanceLunar Distance
Suzanne Wallinga (ed.)
De Hallen Haarlem, 2009
ISBN 978-94-90198-02-2

Dutch and English
17 x 24 cm / 80 p. / paperback
€15,-

Order here (by contact form)
LEV: “We depend on routines. We know our part. We look into the camera, the camera peers into the fog—and perhaps, in turn, the fog peers into us. Not the other way round. We are not supposed to peer into our own depths. Like in Sartre’s hell, we lack mirrors. They were not on the checklist. Unlike all other optical instruments, mirrors are not an important asset for scientists.

“A few days ago I had her take the daily photograph for once. Her hands wavered as she measured the light and adjusted the camera settings. It was painful to watch her being at the mercy of the machine, but it was somehow telling. I don’t know why I wasn’t inclined to help her. Maybe I realised I had to let her go through it on her own, to make her see that she was actually better off doing her drawings.”

 

Indirect Speech II, 2009



UTE: “I vividly remember day three-eighty one. But then, every day could have been like this. He enquired optimistically about my sketch. He asked if it was finished. I handed him the sheet. He said it was sketch number 381. So many already, I wondered? I observed his movements as he walked towards the rack and removed one of the archive boxes. He opened it and placed the sheet on top. He looked briefly at the sketch, then lifted one of the corners of the pile and flicked through the sheets with his thumb.

“I asked him why he did that. He did not understand what I meant. Store things. Keep things. He shrugged his shoulders, saying it was nothing. I said that the drawing was nothing, too. He replied that the drawing was the principal activity of the expedition. I shook my head, reminding him he took a photograph with the field camera every day for research purposes. I said I couldn’t match that. Then he said: Exactly. But still you continue. I can’t match that.”

 

Indirect Speech I, 2008

Indirect Speech, a dual monologue on vinyl, bears the voices of the two characters from my 2008 novella Plateau. The woman, Ute, reflects on past events while trying to reconcile herself with her unresolved feelings. On the other side of the record we hear Lev, still unaware of the encroaching calamity, questioning the purpose of their presence on the ice.

The two voices reveal a mutual affection, which nevertheless ends with the listener, who is left to flip the record, and the reader, who knows the events have already caught up with them.

Indirect Speech I was read by Monica Blok for a performance by Gwenneth Boelens and me. Indirect Speech II was recorded in a studio by Scottish actor Graham Valentine. Both monologues were pressed onto vinyl for an exhibition at Next Visit, Berlin, in May 2009.

jcj vanderheydenIndirect Speech
Nickel van Duijvenboden
Il faut, 2009

English spoken
12" record / 17 min.

On request
Lev. He had not returned. For fear of losing the mental image of his face, his body and his movements, she clung to what she could clearly call to mind. A laconic face above a yellow winter jacket. Crouched over the copper capsule. Why did she remember this particular moment so clearly... It was not the situation she would have chosen for a mental photograph of him, even though it was probably the last time that she had observed him closely — the last time she had caught him glimpsing at her in a way that flattered her, made her overly conscious of herself as her body brushed against his.

She considered the fact that she cherished a moment in which he reflected her own, awfully egoistic, longings. But however much she tried to concentrate on an alternative version of Lev, her thoughts disintegrated with every attempt. Her inability to imagine him in another situation taunted her, but she had to accept it. Was that why she had not pursued her search, because she had wanted to protect herself from that image? Was it because she was afraid of finding him, leaving her unable to keep him alive even in her imagination?

On the other hand, what she had seen at the radio tower was arguably an equally bitter reality. The thought of the glue-like ice-hole and the goose down mingled persistently with the other image. The one busy ousting the other. Few impressions were powerful enough to deny her a way out. Although she had seen enough to accept that he was no longer alive, it was not enough to accept it as definitive. She was entrapped.

A short fiction set in the Cold War era, Plateau features two scientists stationed on the Arctic drift ice for a year. The question how they should relate to the landscape forms the heart of a discussion which seems to be driving them apart.

The idea to write Plateau arose in 2007, while I was flipping through a 1968 Encyclopaedia Brittanica. I realised that the vast amount of knowledge required to fill all 25 volumes, had by now become obsolete – but that didn’t make it less inspiring. The old black and white illustrations, together with lemmas on polar explorations, satellites and cartography, conjured up the ideal backdrop for a close encounter between art and science.

This encounter is personified by two characters: the thoughtful climatologist Ute, always striving for pure objectivity; and the nonchalant Lev, whose attitude towards science is characterised by irony. In spite of this difference, they have to acccept that they are subject to the same conditions: nature, the senses, and each other.

Plateau was published in December 2008 by Roma Publications. It was designed by Roger Willems, edited by Arnoud Holleman and Cathelijne Hoorn, and illustrated by Gwenneth Boelens. It is my second book, following the 2003 collection of essays The Grand Absence.
plateauPlateau
Nickel van Duijvenboden
Roma Publications, 2008
ISBN 978-90-77459-33-1

Dutch and English
14 x 20,5 cm / 2 x 48 p. / paperback
€13,50

Order here
Hauser felt as if he were being strangled. The scene moved him, though he could not have said exactly why. Meanwhile, the screenwriter had come over to him.

“This was an incredibly difficult bit to write,” he said in a low voice.

Hauser avoided his eyes. “Was it?”

“I get distracted,” the screenwriter continued. “Happens every time. I watch movies, sort my photos, listen to music, read the paper—it’s a nightmare.”

Hauser nodded. He had no idea what the screenwriter was talking about.

“It’s because of the high expectations. It has to be memorable. A new image. Nothing less. But when I’m under pressure, I always take the path of least resistance. A scene like this, for example, I can write out of the corner of my eye, in just a few seconds, between one thing and another, making coffee and watching TV. It has nothing to do with concentration any more. It’s pure fragmentation.”

“Fragmentation,” Hauser repeated.

“Yes. As a mode. Instead of concentration. We don’t need to pause for breath anymore as we process all the images coming at us. Those days are behind us. The transition from one thing to another is seamless.”

The director looked distractedly over his shoulder at the screenwriter, who broke off his monologue. In the silence that followed, Hauser returned his attention to the actors. The man was still lying on the floor, while the boy was walking away, into the depths of the warehouse. The image of the child making his way alone stirred something inside him that he couldn’t suppress simply by swallowing. It was shattering.

“Okay, stop,” the director said suddenly. “Let’s pack it in.”

As the entire crew slowly set to work, he rushed ahead of them to the door, fishing his sunglasses out of his pocket and flipping them open. “Thanks,” he mumbled as he went by.

“That was...” Hauser began, hurrying after him, “That was...”

“That was a one-time deal,” he replied brusquely. “I’m scrapping that scene. I had to see it to be sure I could get rid of it.”

The short story ‘Reservoir’ was written for the text book Questioning History: Imagining the Past in Contemporary Art. In response to Frank van der Stok’s statement that the images that surround us offer a very limited view on history, 18 authors wrote a contribution, among whom Peter Delpeut, Jan Verwoert and Val Williams.

‘Reservoir’ is one of the few fiction texts in the book. It has a motto by Werner Herzog: “I have the impression that the images that surround us today are worn out; they are abused and useless and exhausted. [...]
The lack of adequate imagery is a danger. It is as serious a defect as being without memory. [...]
If we do not develop adequate images we will die out like dinosaurs.”

The perception of the main character serves as an evocation of this notion. Through his eyes every occurrence seems like an absolute novelty. In a nondescript landscape, he is the caretaker of two warehouses: one seemingly empty, the other seemingly occupied.
questioning historyQuestioning History: Imagining the Past in Contemporary Art
Frank van der Stok (ed.)
NAi Publishers, 2008
ISBN 978-90-5662-659-4

English
14.5 x 22.8 cm / 180 p. / paperback
€23,50

Order here
The sound of my footsteps alters as I step on the grit of the parking space behind the low church of Hohenau. It is a fine type of grit, ivory-coloured, like ground bones. The dust soils my shoes. I stand still, a couple of metres from the car, Jacq’s dilapidated flesh-coloured 504. I need a moment to convince myself that it really is his car. As I walk to the front of the car, I immediately recognise the double headlights, the surly grille where the metal Peugeot emblem is missing. I needlessly look through the car window and see my own crumpled Kodak packaging sticking out of the ashtray.

Dazed, I walk over the grass and flop down at a picnic table in the shade under the trees. The confirmation that Jacq is here, at the moment when I had stopped believing in it, has knocked the wind out of me. For the first time I become aware that I have been following him like a detective, that I am sticking my nose into his affairs. What am I doing here? Clearly no one is in need of my ominous tourism. Do I wish to confront him? Now that I have come across his tracks, I can no longer pretend to myself that I just wanted to know what he is up to. No, I want him to account for himself. Why has he left me alone, what was so important, and what merits so much secrecy?

In the meantime I pick at the shapes carved in the table-top. Squares have been carved in various places with a sharp object, divided into four smaller squares. The figure strikes me as a remnant of a repentant vandal: from my youth I remember that this is the quickest way of erasing a swastika. Joining up the arms so that you are left with just a square comprised of four smaller squares. How often have I had to do this, confronted with the vague sense of shame that remained after I had defiled a school desk or a toilet with the square icon? The figure never failed to shock me, even though I drew the offensive interplay of angular lines in a spirit of wantonness. To me it was a symbol of the unspeakable; not erasing it would have been a grave error. But the sensation of the transgression and then subsequently correcting myself, brought me close enough to the limit to taste what it was like to be evil.

Hohenau is the name of a village founded by German colonists in Paraguay. This village plays an important role in the short fiction Wytske van Keulen asked me to write for her photo book We would come to doubt everything. And almost everyone would come to doubt.

A young photographer visits his enigmatic great-uncle Jacq, who moved to Paraguay thirty years ago for reasons that have always remained obscured to the family in the Netherlands. His ambitious goal is to “disclose” Jacq’s hermitic life, but the latter isn’t exactly eager to cooperate. Without notice, he sometimes leaves his nephew alone in the house for days on end.

The photographer locates his great-uncle in Hohenau by means of a newspaper clipping he finds in a drawer. Its headline reads: “Nazi officials seeking refuge in Latin America”. However, history is far more complicated than the photographer’s hasty puzzling seemed to suggest.

‘Hohenau’ came about through loose associations with the photographs Wytske van Keulen made of a far relative living abroad. Though reality and fiction share some parallels, the outcome is totally different.
we would come to doubtWe would come to doubt everything. And almost everyone would come to doubt.
Wystke van Keulen en Nickel van Duijvenboden
Self-issued, 2008
ISBN 978-90-813733-1-9

Dutch and English
11.5 x 18 cm / 328 p. / hardcover
€25

Order here
He passed the last house and halted. Built some years ago, it had never been inhabited. Peering through the mesh fencing and the reflecting glass, he caught a glimpse of its interior. It was sparse, elementary, a minimum. Table at the window, two armchairs by the fireplace. No curtains or lights.

A framed portrait hung above the chimney breast. Even without a proper view he was able to recognize it: the frontal one, with the uniform. He had it too, at home. Everybody did. He pictured the dust on the frame, on the furniture, on the floor. The smell inside the house. He pictured the man for whom it was built, but who had never been there.

On the terrace were four garden chairs resting against a table on their front legs. A masoned windbreak. A stained gas tank. A small pool with a concrete edge, empty. The lawn between the terrace and the empty swimming pool had been trimmed no so long ago. They kept it, for the absent one. But that did not exceed the lawn. The molehills were merely leveled. A sublime metaphore for the nation: a superficial order that was being eaten away from within.

As he quietly made his way through the thicket, the framed portrait stuck in his mind, as if it kept staring at him. That one sole image, he thought, in an endless reproduction, should illustrate an absolute ban on all images.

‘Wild Viewing Screen’ is a short story written for the anniversary publication of AKV/St. Joost, an art academy in the south of Holland. The book is titled De laatste fotograaf? which translates as ‘The Last Photographer?’

Starting point for the text was a totalitarian state where an absolute ban on photographic images is enforced. The protagonist is among the last to own a loaded camera. We follow him on an expedition through a restricted zone; his personal and political situation can be deduced from his observations.

The title ‘Wild Viewing Screen’ is a literal translation of the Dutch “wildkijkscherm”, an object found in nature reserves throughout The Netherlands. They enable one to observe the wildlife unnoticed. Because their location, build and outlook are so arbitrary, the word “wild viewing screen” could also be interpreted as ‘screen for a wild view’. In the story, the presence of such a screen is both physical and symbolical.
de laatste fotograafDe laatste fotograaf?
Flip Bool, Marga Rotteveel, Fw: (ed.)
AKV | St.Joost, 2008
ISBN 978-90-76861-15-9

Dutch
16 x 22 cm / 216 p. / paperback
€17,50

Order here
It all begins with the removal from a cooled storehouse. A dramatic reheating ensues. The temperature rises with about ten degrees, but remains chilly all the same. Here you spend the night. The following morning, the same person transports you once again, but this time to a warmer spot at room temperature. You end up on a table, where you are subjected to a superficial examination under glaring lamplight. Possible damage is recorded and inventoried. Gloved fingers are set to work. Before you even realize, a scalpel pries you open. Organic tissue is removed, disappearing without further ado into a waste basket. You end up naked on a white surface that after a moment’s flicker lights up into a glaring white. Everything tightens inside. This must be what pain at a molecular level feels like.

It’s been years since you were exposed to so much light. It reminds you of that very first time, when you were still blank and greeted by a joyful scene. Then too, it happened with an unexpected flash searing a drawing of light onto your dark support.  That’s what started it all, fifty-three years ago. Almost right after that, you were submerged into some foul fluid, in pitch-dark, time and time again. It bit into you, it made you swell up. Then, for the first time, you were exposed to the light of a lamp for a prolonged period of time. They cut you up into equal pieces and clasped you into a rectangular housing, so people could take in your fixed impression through a small window preventing them from soiling you with their sweaty fingers.

Strangely enough, the doctor is wearing cotton gloves this time. Together with others, you are subjected to a slow procedure scanning you from both sides in a light box. Nothing escapes scrutiny. Your inside is exposed, fragmented and reconstructed elsewhere. It seems you are being discarded. Afterwards you are brought back to your original state, with your wafer-thin essence joined without stitches to the frame where they lifted you from. You feel mangled – yes, that’s exactly the phrase: to mangle. What sort of laboratory is this anyway?

‘Metamorphosis’ is an interior monologue of an ambiguous character and an analysis of the gaze. Serving a starting point is a found photo album depicting high-ranking SS officers in the vicinity of Auschwitz, enjoying their time off. The pictures were taken in the summer of 1944, when the exterminations were proceeding at peak level. Among the portrayed is Josef Mengele, the ‘Angel of Death’, who conducted cruel experiments on inmates.

The news of the album’s discovery reminded me of a series of colour slides taken by a German soldier, which I had once digitised as a job for a conservation lab. I had noticed that my task made me look at the images as ‘material’. I worked without delving too deep into the meaning of the images.

This attitude is addressed in ‘Metamorphosis’. I imagined a situation where a conservator is faced with slides of Mengele, without asking himself who the depicted person might be. This stance is similar to the gaze of a camera: it perceives only one dimension of Auschwitz ’44 and is oblivious to underlying realities. The images’ significance is doubly overlooked.

‘Metamorphosis’ was written for the lecture series The Past in the Present compiled by Frank van der Stok, and read to an audience in Las Palmas, Rotterdam in October 2007. It was simultaneously published as the second issue of Il faut. In December 2008, it was republished by Fotomuseum Antwerp for their magazine.
il faut 2 Il faut 2: Metamorphosis
Nickel van Duijvenboden & Gwenneth Boelens
Il faut, 2007

Dutch or English
29,7 x 42 cm / 1 p. / photocopy with manually applied adhesive
€15 (with numbers 1 and 4)

Order here
There are places where no borders, demarcations, dividing lines exist. Just gradual transitions, grey areas dotted with debris. I guess it depends how you approach it. If you were to zoom out to the proverbial Great Wall distance, you would either see no border at all, or a distinct line, cutting through land with great precision, but showing no marks on the surface.

You might not be able to distinguish a fault line while standing on one. Other places, however, might retain obvious transitory features, forming a mental vacuum, invisibly charged, brimming with history, its existence unregistered by the senses or other, more objective means. Out there, nature slowly covers up remnants, both destroying and retaining.


But not here. Here, I am one of Ramble, not covered up but covered, monitored. Every patch of land was pre-planned, before our arrival. This place should have been a carbon copy of our original habitat, but it is merely the embodiment of an architect’s lack of imagination. Or maybe it is an abstraction of the idea of a habitat where, due to spacial  and economic limits, each requisite ingredient is sparsely represented. The architect’s explanation would be that the whole thing is so delicately balanced; to minimize the parameters is to maximize control. And so each element – down to the tiniest grain – balances out the other.

‘Ramble’ was written for a spatial installation by visual artist Gwenneth Boelens. In it the viewer is surrounded by a botanical scene constructed from black and white photo fragments. Meanwhile a female voice is heard, pronouncing a monologue about an “artificial wilderness” in which nothing is left to chance.

The work Ramble contains allusions to various human efforts to simulate nature. Both text and images, however, draw attention to situations man could never create, and details that will always give away planning and premeditation.
il faut 1Il faut 1: Ramble
Nickel van Duijvenboden & Gwenneth Boelens
Il faut, 2006

English
18 x 26 cm / 8 p. / stapled
€15 (with numbers 2 and 4)

Order here
The voice came from his left.

“Yes,” said the young man eagerly, when he was acknowledged. “I was wondering – after this lecture in which, if I may be so free, you criticise everything – whether there is anything, any artists, works, books, that you do admire?”

This for Howard was the most difficult question conceivable. He was on his own here and adopted an innocent grin. Why hadn’t he prepared for this? His audience suddenly regarded him with sincere interest and some even held their pens at the ready. He experienced that strange sensation again: here he was the cynic who excelled in inflammatory speeches always directed against something, who could only discuss such matters in a negative light, and yet his audience appeared so interested in his taste. As if someone who could express his aversion to things so perfectly, would also be able to talk about what he loved so infectiously. He himself doubted whether he loved anything at all.

Because his silence had began to exceed the limits of the customary pause for thought, the young man sat up straight in his chair as if giving weight to what, after all, had been a perfectly legitimate question.

“Because, if you yourself create a work, I mean, you are a visual artist aren’t you? - then it must be difficult - to my way of thinking - not having a positive force to motivate you. Something to enthuse about.”

Howard tapped the edge of the lectern with the stick, the stick containing the rolled-up images which, according to him, were indeed nothing less than ashes...

Howard, realistic painter and cynic borrowed from a novel by Zadie Smith, is one day lecturing an audience of art students. He scornfully criticises artists who conceive their works “flirtatiously”. He believes that only by “slaving away at it”, the creative process can result in something significant. Afterwards, when asked to share some positive thoughts for a change, he does not know what to say.

A few days later he doubtfully regards his own work: explicit paintings of gruesome scenes, like the splattered corpses of “WTC Jumpers” and child rapes. It is beginning to dawn on him that his total lack of positive inspiration only led him into artistic block. From then on, Howard is on an endeavor to find an antidote to his cynical frame of mind.

For me, writing ‘Howard’ meant a break with my usual working method. Not only is it fiction, when a typical lecture was to be expected; this story is also a rather optimistic one, in contrast to his earlier writings, which were intermittently skeptical and polemic. To an extent, Howard can be considered an alter ego.

The setting of the lecture Howard delivers in the story ironically corresponded to reality. ‘Howard’ was written for Academie Minerva in Groningen, where in October 2006 it was read aloud in addition to a workshop by German photographer Peter Bialobrzeski. During the reading, a selection of images was shown on a television monitor.

Download the full text in Documents
We find ourselves in a city we cannot leave, yet we are not aware of this. The city has been built with great care, so that you unconsciously move in circles. At the city edge there are strings of houses or bushes, not very different from the ones in other streets, that press you back into the city centre, with a naturalness that is inclined to make you believe that after the final street there will be countless others.

If you desire, you may enter some of the houses. The space to move around extends as far as several storeys. You will not discover sanitation. Some houses don’t even possess a front door. You can only view these from the outside, but the absence of an entrance can’t keep you from imagining the interior.

Somewhere in the city you own a garage where you can store fancy cars and motorbikes. One way or another, it is never very difficult to rediscover the accessible houses or the garage. If you wait long enough, you’ll come across it again as a matter of course. You are, it seems, fated to discover important and pleasant spots, for they are located along exactly the route that is an obvious part of an ever more familiar circumference.

The various neighbourhoods have each got a certain identity. There are palm trees in the streets, lampposts, traffic lights. Waiting for these to turn green would however be absurd. In this respect, it’s a cardboard world: details appear to make sense, but don’t.

At times, we see each other driving among the rest of the traffic. We are not allowed to adopt a speed slower than the maximum and do not at all feel the need to.We are in this city to kill each other. The opportunities to harm one another are limitless. Here, death is painless, instantly followed by a flash of light at your character’s spawnpoint, a flash which implies your reincarnation.

A first sound work, Strings is a soliloquy about a virtual city based on the architectural aspects of video games. The text marvels at the sense of liberty and haphazardness that virtual worlds can evoke despite their conspicuously constructed nature.

Originally a text, Strings was presented as an art object at a gallery. It consists of a silkscreen print in an edition of twelve and an audio CD. Next to a spoken version of the text printed, the CD contains a half hour-long session of a female voice pronouncing personal notes kept during the process of creating this work.

Not having been rehearsed, the disordered notes are read in a faltering, hesitant manner, placing emphasis on the process of translation between unrefined ideas and a concise final result.
reeksReeks
Nickel van Duijvenboden
CD with silk screen print, edition of 12

Dutch
14,8 x 21 cm
€120,-
The day after my graduate show opened, my father rang me up from abroad. He asked what the opening had been like and how the exhibition was going.

“It’s a shame you can’t be here”, was the first thing I said.

“I am trying to visualize it from here. I was hoping you’d be able to feed me a few details”, he said cheerfully.

To visualize something. I was instantly reminded of his last article, which was coincidentally about this same subject. My father contended that “to visualize something” actually means to place yourself in the role that you would have had in the situation you are trying to visualize; not just a simple, cerebral visualization or projection, but an actual “being present” or role play, acting if you will, with the only limitation that you cannot be physically present. With age comes the skill to keep this to oneself; the subtle act of inner visualization.

I didn’t dare to tell my father that this conversation, during which he was making a visualization of my situation, was a perfect opportunity to test out his assertion. Was he really acting as if he was with me, inside himself? After we had spoken, would he no longer have the need to come? If he only knew how much his presence would have meant to me, whether it was mental or physical.

In ‘The Grand Absence’, I imagine a situation where a father cannot attend the opening of his son’s graduate exhibition. Instead they discuss over the phone the “objective photographs” the son put on display. Their animated dialogue is intermitted with quotes and thoughts on art, photography and imagination.

This essay is my attempt to verbalise the deadlock I experience between written and visual language. The question is: is it really necessary that the father come to see the actual pictures, or might the son as well explain what is there to be seen? At the same time ‘The Grand Absence’ deals with a more personal issue, that of a son lacking acknowledgment from his father.

Published along with six other essays, The Grand Absence formed my graduation work. The exam was characterised by the total absence of images. During the evaluation as well as at the opening, I merely recited a passage from the book. I graduated as a photographer without showing any photographs.

De grote afwezige; Essays over fotografie, as the publication is called in Dutch, is a self issued edition of 500.

Download the full essay ‘The Grand Absence’ in Documents
de grote afwezigeDe grote afwezige: Essays over fotografie
Nickel van Duijvenboden
Self-issued, 2003

Dutch
15,5 x 22,5 cm / 48 p. / paperback
€12,50

Order here